“His advice was a combination of efficiency and commercial practicality.” and “His high level of professionalism instilled strong confidence.” – Legal 500

Jared has more than a decade’s experience helping his clients protect and preserve their wealth, investments, and businesses.  He has been described as a leader in his field of work by Legal 500. 

Jared has practiced at two of top-tier dispute resolution firms. He undertakes a broad range of contentious work with a focus on private wealth disputes. He is well versed at handling trial, appellate, arbitration and advisory matters.  

EXPERIENCE

Trust Disputes

  • Advised a $100 million charitable trust concerning allegations made by beneficiary charity.
  • Counsel for a Singapore investment holding company in Court proceedings and coordinated strategies with estate proceedings in Estonia and insolvency proceedings in Northern Ireland: HC/OS 1050/2021
  • Advised a trustee services company on subrogation rights under a bank loan.
  • Advised a beneficiary on actions against an errant trustee.
  • Advised a Singapore private bank on obligations with respect to investment accounts held by a senior member of the Bahraini royal family prior to his passing and on communications with surviving family members.

Investment Disputes

  • Advised Singapore’s leading cryptocurrency exchange on matters arising from the collapse of Three Arrows Capital.
  • Counsel for a dissatisfied investor in a Malaysian hotel development project: HC/S 195/2021
  • Counsel for a private company in a claim arising from an investment loan: HC/S 1244/2020.
  • Counsel in a dispute arising from seed investments into the development of a platform to deliver near real time news verification: DC/OC 1159/2022.

Representing Family Businesses

  • Counsel for a family in defending a S$30.9 million arbitration claim arising from the sale of their family business: SIAC Arb No. 254 of 2022.
  • Counsel for a family in an arbitration involving a US$2.4 billion fraud claim arising from the sale of a family-owned pharmaceutical company: ICC Case No. 19074/CYK.
  • Counsel for a family in a joint venture dispute concerning a Asian supply chain for polymer parts used in the manufacture of high-end consumer electronics: HC/S236/2017; HC/S 238/2017; HC/S 910/2017; HC/S 312/2018.
  • Counsel for a family business in cross-appeals before the Singapore Court of Appeal and reduced quantum of judgement sum to nominal damages: CA/CA 155/2017; CA/CA 157/2017.
  • Counsel for a family’s waste to energy business in a dispute over a services contract: HC/S 468/2015.
  • Counsel for family’s interest in a die cut business and resisted an appeal on the basis that the matter was functus officio: CA/CA 147/2019; CA/CA 148/2019.
  • Counsel for a family in a joint venture dispute concerning a Asian supply chain for polymer parts used in the manufacture of high-end consumer electronics: HC/S236/2017; HC/S 238/2017; HC/S 910/2017; HC/S 312/2018.

Shareholder & Joint Venture Disputes

  • Counsel in a shareholders’ dispute over a palm oil conglomerate.
  • Counsel in a shareholders’ dispute arising from a family run food and restaurant conglomerate: HC/S 465/2021.
  • Counsel for a minority shareholder in a dispute over corporate control of a fund manager: HC/S 374/2019; HC/S 490/2019.
  • Advised an LSE listed mining company on a potential shareholders’ dispute.
  • Advised a shareholder in a dispute over a company manufacturing military and controlled equipment.
  • Counsel for majority shareholders in valuation proceedings: HC/S 125/2014.
  • Counsel for a majority shareholder in arbitrations arising from a joint venture to construct, develop and operate an integrated marina, residential and commercial development in MoDao Island, China: SIAC Arb 48/2018; SIAC Arb 70/2018.
  • Counsel for a substantial shareholder in a dispute over the corporate control of a Singapore public listed company: HC/S571/2017.
  • Represented shareholders in a joint venture dispute over the construction and development of a mix-use property development known as the Capitol Singapore: HC/OS 1007-9/2016; HC/CWU 72-4/2016.

Financial Services Disputes

  • Counsel for the Singapore branch of a French bank in a US$60 million claim arising from the fraudulent presentation of documents under a letter of credit: HC/S 459/2020.
  • Advised the Singapore branch of a Malaysian bank in a US$70 million claim arising from the fraudulent presentation of documents under a letter of credit.
  • Counsel for a private bank in defending against claims for unauthorized currency trading: HC/S 125/2011.
  • Counsel for a trustee services company from claims arising from falsified payment instructions: SIAC Arb 55/2021.
  • Advised a Cayman segregated portfolio company in a dispute with an investment manager concerning the management of US$800 million in assets.
  • Represented a local bank in defending claims for misrepresentation and contravention of the Financial Advisers Act: HC/S 232/2017.
  • Represented a project development company in defending a claim for payment for financial advisory services in relation to the development of a US$2 billion aromatic chemicals plant: CA/CA 95/2013; CA/CA 97/2013.

Workplace & Employment Disputes

  • Counsel for a former employee of a FinTech company in a claim for unpaid commissions: HC/OC 78/2023.
  • Counsel for a French group of companies in resisting a former employees claims for retrenchment benefits: DC/OC 1431/2024.
  • Counsel for a large accounting firm concerning a former partner’s claim for psychiatric harm: HKIAC/PA21255.
  • Counsel for an insurance company in a multibillion-dollar claim arising from the mass solicitation of an agency unit: HC/S 722/2016; AD/CA 78, 79 and 97/2021
  • Advised a large distributor of fast-moving consumer goods in investigations concerning the breach of fair employment regulations.
  • Advised the Inquiry Committee of a government-linked company on investigations into a sexual harassment complaint made against a senior board member.
  • Counsel for a project development company in the trial involving an employment dispute: DC/S 3012/2012/H.
  • Counsel for an advertising company in a trial involving the enforcement of restrictive covenants and payment of employee benefits: HC/S 353/2012; HC/S 409/2012.
  • Counsel for former employees of a security firm in an employment dispute: HC/S 671/2010.

Commercial Disputes

  • Counsel for a NYSE listed company in international trade disputes with a Japanese trading partner: SIAC Arb 412/2023; SIAC Arb 218/2023.
  • Instructing counsel for a large food caterer to the aviation industry in an application to restrain Korean proceedings commenced in breach of an arbitration agreement: SIC/OA 14/2023; CA/CAS 12/2023.
  • Counsel for a commodities trading company in numerous arbitration and litigation proceedings in connection with claims arising from the actions of a rogue trader: HC/S 227/2017; HC/S 362/2017; SIAC Arbs 143-202/2017; SIAC Arb 216/2017; SIAC Arb 188/2018.
  • Counsel for the liquidators of a company in claims against its former directors and senior employees for losses caused by mismanagement and corruption: HC/S 1067/2015.
  • Counsel for a Malaysian government-linked company in pursuing a claim against an Indonesian government-linked insurer under a credit insurance policy: SIAC ARB 011/10/MM.
  • Counsel for secured creditors of the OW Bunker Group in numerous arbitration and litigation proceedings in connection with the recovery of assets secured under a US$700 million credit facility following the collapse of the group.
  • Counsel for a Malaysian-listed company and its Singapore subsidiary in defending fraud and conspiracy claims brought by the Singapore Comptroller of Income Tax: HC/S 350/2014; CA/CA 189/2015.
  • Successfully invoked the High Court’s inherent case management powers to stay proceedings in favour of arbitration: HC/S 362/2017.
  • Disputes counsel on a team advising a large social media and messaging platform on the launch of their P2M services.
  • Advised a US petrochemical trader on a dispute with a trading partner.

Reported Decisions

  • Asiana Airlines, Inc v Gate Gourmet Korea Co, Ltd [2024] SGCA(I) 8
  • Gate Gourmet Korea Co, Ltd v Asiana Airlines, Inc [2023] SGHC(I) 23
  • Annus, Kristin v Annus, Jekaterina [2023] SGHC] 110
  • Prudential Assurance Co Singapore (Pte) Ltd v Tan Shou Yi Peter [2021] SGHC 109
  • Wei Fengpinv Low Tuck Loong Raymond [2021] SGHC 90
  • Retrospect Investment (S) Pte Ltd v Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd [2020] SGCA 15
  • Liew Kit Fah and others v Koh Keng Chew [2019] SGCA 78
  • Tan Choon Wee v Pine Capital Group Ltd [2019] SGHC 201
  • Poh Lian Construction (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) v Lauw Wisanggeni [2019] SGHC 114
  • Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] SGCA 11
  • Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah [2018] SGHC 262
  • Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2018] SGHC 172
  • Biofuel Industries Pte Ltd v V8 Environmental Pte Ltd [2018] SGCA 28
  • BASF Intertrade AG Singapore Branch v H&C S Holding Pte Ltd [2017] SGHCR 10
  • Biofuel Industries Pte Ltd v V8 Environmental Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 184
  • ARX v Comptroller of Income Tax [2016] SGCA 56
  • Precious Shipping Public Co Ltd v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 187
  • Choo Liang Haw v Chua Seet Mui [2015] SGHC 47
  • Kraze Entertainment (S) Pte Ltd v Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 39

MEMBERSHIPS / DIRECTORSHIPS

  • Fellow, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
  • Affiliate, Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners
  • Independent Director, EtonHouse Community Fund

Location(s)

Practice Area(s)

Qualifications

  • LLB, National University of Singapore
  • Advocate & Solicitor, Singapore

Scan for vCard

Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia.

Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client.

This website is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this website.

© 2024 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. All rights reserved. Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (UEN T08LL0005E) is registered in Singapore under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act (Chapter 163A) with limited liability.